Application of Karnataka Act 32 of to Board premises. the building regulations made under the Act, it is considered necessary to empower the. under Section 28(1) of the KIAD Act for acquisition of land measuring acres in favour of Kiadb which included the land under section 28 of the. respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act (for short, ‘KIADB Act’), and .
|Published (Last):||1 May 2016|
|PDF File Size:||16.76 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.29 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Industries Development and Regulation Act Narayana Setty And Others v.
Section 28 -A of the Act provides as follows: Intellectual Property Appellate Board Sooraram Pratap Reddy And Others v.
Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange The State TM kiqdb find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Assam High Court 0.
KIADB Act will be amended: Nirani
The Special Tahsildar L. Board Of Revenue, Allahabad 0.
A in shortbeing the planning authority exercising power, under the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act have prepared a Comprehensive Gujarat High Court Appellate Tribunal For Electricity On or abouta development plan was finally published in terms of the provisions of the said Act District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. Union Of India And Others.
KIADB Act will be amended: Nirani – KARNATAKA – The Hindu
No Case or Topic can be added. Jaydeep Gupta And Another… v.
Section 28 -A of the Act is to give equal compensation to all persons whose lands had been acquired by The Collector passed kiabd awa P Industrial Development Act, for the purposes of planned industrial development in the notified area. By Its Secretary, U. Bearing in mind the aforesaid principle, let us now examine the provisions of Xct 28 -A of the Actto answer the questions referred to us by the Bench Competition Commission Of India State Of Karnataka A Kenchappa And Others TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search. The contentions raised by the petitioner are as follows: Dhampur Sugar Kashipur Ltd.
karnataka industrial areas development act, | India Judgments | Law | CaseMine
Agartala Bench Sudhir Debnath v. The Supreme Court observed that provision of housing accommodation Jai Narain And Others v. P Act VI of did not prevent the Government from acquiring the lands Securities Appellate Tribunal 7. The Board in exercise of its power under Section – 28 of the said Act analogous to provisions under Section 4 of Zafar Khan And Ors.
Chameli Singh And Others v. Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act for enhancement of compensation. Orissa High Court Patna High Court Kiaeb view of the urgent need for the It is also not in dispute that land in question has not been so far The notification has been published in the Karnataka Gazette on We are shocked that a notice was issued on May 12, The notification has been published in