Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians has 51 ratings and 0 reviews. Ibn Taymiyya, one of the greatest and most prolific thinkers of. Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians by Ibn Taymiyyah, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide. Ibn Taymiyya, Against the Greek Logicians Introduction and translation by Wael B . Hallaq Oxford: Clarendon Press, Iviii + p. Show all authors.
|Published (Last):||17 March 2010|
|PDF File Size:||10.73 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.82 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Concepts and judgements are either primary or acquired; ‘a thing’ and ‘an existent’ are, for instance, primary concepts, for they are known without reflection. But considering the sheer value of the work it’s one of my personal favs along …more As far as I know, no.
See also al-Radd, 6 1 – 2. That Logiccians Taymiyya agaiinst this established form of discourse should come as no surprise.
The introduction of Greek philosophy into the Muslim world left an indelible mark on Islamic intellectual history. And as a confirmation of this position we find him in one place declaring that mathematical principles, such as ‘one is half two’, are a priori, for God implants them in our souls upon birth. Ibn Taymiyya’s argument here again rests on his assumption that the definition, as well as the description, does not necessarily reveal the quiddity of the definiendum.
Furthermore, the essence, in a sense, presupposes the object, just as humanity presupposes animality. It is equally interesting to observe that in his Naqd al-Mantiq he omits this argument altogether. Ibn Taymiyya and His Times. Nothing in the extramental world or in natural intelligence attests to that. Nor did he attempt, as more recent critics have done, 1 6 to refute or argue against the many secondary, and sometimes marginal, suppositions and postulates of logical doctrines.
Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians by أحمد بن عبد الحليم بن تيمية
Hallaq has proved an enormously capable writer in his field. The essence is that without which a thing having this essence can never be an object of our apprehension. They maintained that ‘if a thing were not subsistent [in an external reality other than that of its own existence] it could not be the object of such knowledge and intention [etc.
Both of these claims are 6 Muhammad b. In literally dozens of his treatises, Ibn Taymiyya untiringly asserts time and again that universals can never exist in ggeek external world; they can exist only in the mind and nowhere else. HN As far as I know, no.
Ibn Taymiyya against the Greek Logicians
Abu Khalilah Reese rated it it was amazing Feb 15, These arguments lohicians intended to create an aggregate effect; no single argument in the work could, or was expected to, deal a coup de grace to logic. Maha Elkaisy-Friemuth – – Routledge. The first, and perhaps less important, were the relatively short remarks made by these philosophers with regard to difficulties inherent in the logical and philosophical doctrines they were expounding.
Ibn Taymiyya, one of the greatest and most prolific thinkers in medieval Islam, held Gree His goal was simple: His argument is grounded in an empirical approach that in many respects prefigures the philosophies of the British empiricists.
Islam—Doctrines— Early works to Oxford University Press is a department of the Agaibst of Oxford. The universal and abstract mental meaning, Ibn Taymiyya seems to be saying, is identical with the verbal utterance and the written word that stand for that meaning. Thanks for telling us about the problem. They are extremely elliptic and vague. Some two dozen treatises of his must be consulted in order to establish, for instance, his views on the problem of God’s existence.
Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians – Wael B. Hallaq – Oxford University Press
I am infinitely indebted to her for the sustained help and support she offered me throughout this and other projects. But markedly less obvious in his attacks on logic are undercurrents of resentment against what he viewed in a good number of other treatises as the most dangerous of all threats which lay in the heart of Islam, 4 namely, speculative mysticism propounded by such influential figures as Ibn Sab’In d. On this matter, we go along with Rescher’s views expressed in his article ‘The Impact of Arabic Philosophy’, The written word corresponds to, and expresses, the verbal utterance, just as the verbal utterance represents and corresponds to the mental concept which applies to any one of the externally existing individuals.
Ibn Taymeeyah was barely seventeen, when Qadi Al-Maqdisi authorized him to issue Fatwa legal verdict. In this case, the word ‘dates’ and its real definition remain wider than the objective, external reality of busr.
In lieu of seafood, his examples issued from desert animals. Nor does a thing, to be characterized, require a cause other than its own essence. We’re featuring millions of their taymitya ratings on our book pages to help you find your new favourite book.
The sterility of the syllogism for studying natura rerum is then to be attributed to a problematic inherent, not in the formal structure of the argument, but rather in the epistemic value of the premiss which is claimed to be universal.
Those people think that the realities of species, such as the reality of ‘man’, ‘horse’, etc. Authors, expectedly, employed the jargon special to the field within which they were writing, and the utilization of concepts and terminology belonging to another field of enquiry was by and large kept to a minimum.
The most striking of these features is the uncontrollable penchant for digression. The latter was published in in two volumes, of logivians 1 was able to obtain only the first. Ola rated it really liked it Aug 18, To both of them as well as to all the other colleagues I am deeply grateful.