The Devils Of Loudun . Huxley’s vivid account of this bizarre tale of religious and sexual obsession transforms our understanding of the medieval world. The Devils of Loudun: Aldous Huxley: most important later works are The Devils of Loudun (), a detailed psychological study of a historical incident in . A remarkable true story of religious and sexual obsession, The Devils of Loudon is considered by many to be Brave New World author Aldous.
|Published (Last):||11 March 2016|
|PDF File Size:||15.80 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.80 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It deals with actual events, that’s true. Captivating History Narrated by: My constructive criticism to Huxley if he wasn’t dead would be to This book pushes the boundaries of how much tedium I can endure in fiction. After Ford, the deity.
But Huxley was also interested in “cosmic” issues, and there are long digressions including Chapter 3 entire that provides Huxley’s views on the soul, etc. It’s the case when a true story is more complex and amazing than any fiction can be. Books On the Side.
It is multiplicity in isolation from its non-dual Ground. Huxley’s vivid account of this bizarre tale of religious and sexual obsession transforms our understanding of the medieval world. It is not a novel, though. It is that less abundant life, which is lived according to the dictates of the insulated self.
It is a system of verbal categories taking the place of the fathomlessly beautiful and mysterious particulars which constitute reality. The only liberating self-transcendence is through selflessness and docility to inspiration in other words, union with the Son and the Holy Spirit into the consciousness of that union with the Father in which, without knowing it, we have always lived.
In my opinion, it is Russell’s best film and one of Oliver Reed’s best roles. Otherwise, just appreciate the way Huxley weaves his thorough understanding of history, philosophy, and religion through this book.
However, Aldous examines the case for which Grandier was tried, not his general character. Most Helpful Most Recent. In all cases where it can be made to serve the interests of the men controlling church and state, downward self-transcendence by means of herd-intoxication is treated as legitimate, and even highly desirable. The romance of Soeur Jeanne, if held in the right light, assumes a comic aspect.
It is a work of completely undocumented sociology, backed up by Huxley’s credit alone. The novel needs a character to relate to. And I should say at once that, fifteen years after publication, it did seem to wear the appellation “classic” very well.
None of these factors will carry the slightest weight for other readers, and I point them out in a form of anti-recommendation.
The Devils of Loudun – Wikipedia
And this right held good even when, as was here the case, the Prior was at the same time a Bishop. But however great, however important for thought and technology, for social organization and behavior, the differences between then and now are always peripheral. On yet another, it is a mystery, exploring the possible motives of the main players in the drama in Huxley’s, The Devils of Loudun, reading as easily as a well-written novel, purports to be the true story of a seventeenth century case of witchcraft in France.
No historian would be allowed to recreate the likely course of events in which Jeanne, indulging in parlor gossip with pious visitors, learned of Grandier’s reputation and conceived a crush on the beneficed swordsman. At times it was not unlike listening to a pop song that was momentarily thrilling to a small in-crowd.
Maybe it was an “underground classic. A priest is falsely accused of cursing a convent of nuns, causing them to be possessed by demons.
The Devils Of Loudun
Paperbackpages. I’m keenly aware, as I write this, that I read the book because “everybody else” was reading it, too. The events led to several public exorcisms as well as executions by burning. Description In Urbain Grandier, a handsome and dissolute priest of the parish of Loudun was tried, tortured and burnt at the stake.
But looking back and up, from our vantage point on the descending road of modern history, we now see poudun all the evils of religion can flourish without any belief in the supernatural, if convinced materialists are ready to worship their own jerry-built creations as though they were the Absolute, and that self-styled humanists will persecute their adversaries with all the zeal of Inquisitors exterminating the devotees of a personal and transcendent Satan.
We see that in the way they’ve treated their own clergy and brother and sisterhood. This made an enemy of the Reverend Mother. The book itself doesn’t change at all, of course, but your recollection of it changes, and so does whatever use you have made of it. Despite the subject matter being interesting Huxley manages to suck all the excitement out of it like the Hungry Caterpillar munching its way rapidly through a pile of cotton wool.
Huxley by no means writes from a Christian perspective; in this passage, he is simply showing how Christianity accommodates the urge to self-transcendence. He didn’t always put in the translations. Jonathan Haidt, Greg Lukianoff Narrated by: Huxley avoided the historicist fallacy devips criticizing the condemnation of Grandier based upon the values and knowledge of his day.
In his world, where television rules and literature is on the brink of extinction, firemen start fires rather than put them out. Mar 08, Steve Cooper rated it it was amazing. I cannot recommend it more highly. It is a historical narrative of supposed demonic possessionreligious fanaticismsexual repressionand mass hysteria that occurred in 17th-century France surrounding unexplained events that took place in the small town of Loudun.