: Las Dos Babilonias (Spanish Edition) () by Alexander Hislop and a great selection of similar New, Used and Collectible Books. Las Dos Babilonias: Alexander Hislop: Books – Las Dos Babilonias by Alexander Hislop at – ISBN – ISBN – CreateSpace Independent Publishing .
|Country:||Moldova, Republic of|
|Published (Last):||8 March 2014|
|PDF File Size:||8.84 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.24 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
While overlaid with idolatry, the recognition of a Trinity was universal in all the ancient nations of the world, proving how deep-rooted in the babilpnias race was the primeval doctrine on this subject, which comes out so distinctly in Genesis.
From Zonaras we find that the concurrent testimony of the ancient authors he had consulted was to this effect; for, speaking of arithmetic and astronomy, he says: All who have paid the least attention to the literature of Greece, Egypt, Phoenicia, or Rome are aware of the place which the “Mysteries” occupied in babbilonias countries, and that, whatever circumstantial diversities there might be, in all essential respects these “Mysteries” in the different countries were the same.
In both cases such a comparison is most degrading to the King Eternal, and is fitted utterly to pervert the minds of those who contemplate it, as if there was or could be any similitude between such a figure and Him who hath said, “To whom will ye liken God, and what likeness will ye compare unto Him?
The other is the head of an old man, surmounted by a triangle.
What is wanted in one country is supplemented in another; and what actually “crops out” in different directions, to a large extent necessarily determines the character of much that does not directly appear on the surface. Table of Contents The Two Babylons: It evidently meant that He who, ever since the fall, has been revealed to man as the “Merciful and Gracious One” Exo So utterly idolatrous was babilonizs Babylonian recognition of the Divine unity, that Jehovah, the Living God, severely condemned His own people for giving any countenance to it: All these separate facts–all these scattered testimonies, recur to that fruitful principle which places in the East the centre of science and civilisation.
But if the supreme divinity in almost all ancient heathen nations was triune, the futility of this objection must be manifest. Major Moor, speaking of Brahm, the supreme God of the Hindoos, says: Here, then, we find that Brahm is just the same as “Er-Rahman,” “The all-merciful one,”–a title applied by the Turks to the Most High, and that the Hindoos, notwithstanding their deep religious degradation nowhad once known that “the most holy, most high God,” is also “The God of Mercy,” in other words, that gabilonias is “a just God and a Saviour.
These Mysteries were long shrouded in darkness, but now the thick darkness begins to pass away. Now to establish the identity between the systems of ancient Babylon and Papal Rome, we have just to inquire in how far does the system of the Papacy agree with the system established in these Babylonian Mysteries. But yet, even as the geologist, by examining the contents of a fissure here, an upheaval there, babiloniqs what “crops out” of itself on the surface elsewhere, is enabled to determine, with wonderful certainty, the order and general contents of the different strata over all the earth, so is it with the subject of the Chaldean Mysteries.
Las Dos Babilonias (spanish Edition) Alexander Hislop
If there be this general coincidence between the systems of Babylon and Rome, the question arises, Does the coincidence stop here? Therefore, according to the genius of the mystic system of Chaldea, which was to a large extent founded on double meanings, that which, to the eyes of men in general, was only zero, “a circle,” was understood by the initiated to signify zero, “the seed.
Backend server did not respond in time. In prosecuting such an inquiry there are considerable difficulties to be ddos for, as in geology, it hisslop impossible at all points to reach the deep, underlying strata of the earth’s surface, so it is not to be expected that in any one country we should find a complete and connected account of the system established in that country.
In India, the supreme divinity, in like manner, in one of the most ancient cave-temples, is represented with three heads on one body, under the gabilonias of “Eko Deva Trimurtti,” “One God, three forms. Hence, from Dheva or Theva”The Good,” naturally comes the Sanscrit, Devaor, without the digamma, as it frequently is, Deo”God,” the Latin, Deusand the Greek, Theosthe digamma in the original Thevo-s being also dropped, as novus in Latin is neos in Greek.
But there is reason to believe that “Deva” has a much more honourable origin, hlslop that it really came originally from the Chaldee, Thav”good,” which is also legitimately pronounced Thevand in the emphatic form is Theva or Thevo”The Good.
Though modern Hinduism recognises millions of gods, yet the Indian sacred books show that originally it had been far otherwise. There has been a great deal of unsatisfactory speculation in regard to the meaning of this name, but when the different statements in regard to Brahm are carefully considered, it becomes evident that the name Brahm is just the Hebrew Rahm, with the digamma prefixed, which is very frequent in Sanscrit words derived from Hebrew or Chaldee.
It obtained the epithet of perfectand was believed to be the most ancient of religious systems, having preceded that of the Egyptians.
If the angel here referred to had not been God, Jacob could never have invoked him as on an equality with God. Taking, then, the admitted unity and Babylonian character of the ancient Mysteries of Egypt, Greece, Phoenicia, and Rome, as the clue to guide us in our researches, let us go on from step to habilonias in our comparison of the doctrine and practice alesander the two Babylons–the Babylon of the Old Testament and the Babylon of the New.
Alexander Hislop – Wikiwand
Now we find such language applied to Brahm, the one supreme God, as cannot be accounted hielop, except on the supposition that Brahm had the very same meaning as the Hebrew Rahm. Now, as the language of Jeremiah, already quoted, would indicate that Babylon was the primal source from which all these systems of idolatry flowed, so the deductions of the most learned historians, on mere historical grounds have led to the babiloniaas conclusion.
Alexajder, not merely had the ancient Hindoos exalted ideas of the natural perfections of God, but there is evidence that they were well aware of the gracious character of God, as revealed in His dealings with a lost and guilty world.
Kennedy objects alexaander the application of the name “Eko Deva” to the triform image in the cave-temple at Elephanta, on the ground that that name belongs only to the supreme Brahm.
The Egyptians also used the triangle as a symbol of their “triform divinity. The ancient Icelandic mythology calls him “the Author of every thing that existeth, the eternal, the living, and awful Being; the searcher into concealed things, the Being that never changeth.
Las Dos Babilonias by Alexander Hislop (, Paperback) | eBay
To this the answer is, Far otherwise. Most other nations did the same.
It is well known that the Brahmins, to exalt themselves as a priestly, half-divine caste, to whom all others ought to bow down, have for many ages taught that, while the other castes came from the arms, and body and feet of Brahma–the visible representative and manifestation of the invisible Brahm, and identified with him– they alone came from the mouth of the creative God.
The Papacy has in some of its churches, as, for instance, in the monastery of the so-called Trinitarians of Madrid, an image of the Triune God, with three heads on one body.
Some have said that the plural form of the name of God, in the Hebrew of Genesis, affords no argument of the doctrine of plurality of persons in the Godhead, because the same word in the plural is applied to heathen divinities. This is manifest from the very name Brahm, appropriated by them to the one infinite and eternal God. We think it must be painful to any Christian mind, and repugnant to Christian feeling, to look at this figure.
And whence can we have derived this term but from the Arabians, as they, without doubt, had themselves derived it from the Chaldees, the grand original cultivators at once of arithmetic, geometry, and idolatry?
Zero, in this sense, had evidently come from the Chaldee, zer”to encompass,” from which, also, no doubt, was derived the Babylonian name for a great cycle of time, called a ” saros. We have only to bring the ancient Babylonian Mysteries to bear on the whole system of Rome, and then it will be seen how immensely the one has borrowed from the other. After referring to the fact that alexanderr Egyptian priests claimed the honour of having transmitted to the Greeks the first elements aledander Polytheism, he thus concludes: Petersburg, and given xos Parson’s “Japhet.
Thus, we find the God Crishna, in one of the Hindoo sacred books, when asserting his high dignity as a divinity and his identity with the Supreme, using the following words: But how little weight is in this, may be seen from the fact that it is this very term “Achad,” and that without the article, that is used in Deuteronomy, when the Unity of the Godhead is asserted in the most emphatic manner, “Hear, O Israel, Jehovah our God is one Jehovah,” i.
The statement of Bunsen is to the effect that the religious system of Egypt was derived from Asia, and “the primitive empire in Babel. Layard, in his last work, has given a specimen of such a triune divinity, worshipped in ancient Assyria.